Lane
describes to his readers how one can define a place as sacred and gives three
methods in which most religions have followed or still follow today; the
ontological approach, phenomenological approach and the cultural approach. He
states that ontological approach deems a place as sacred on institution and
reason alone. It is only based off of being or an experience and is only seen
sacred through the experiences that have been had there. Cultural however is
the polar opposite of ontological and states a place gains a sacred title
through peoples values, beliefs and disagreement. The place existing and being
called a sacred place is not a good enough reason for it to be called sacred.
The phenomenological approach suggests that the place itself participates in
the idea that it is sacred, so all of the landscape, animals, trees and
mountains around it play a role in understanding why the sacred place is
considered sacred.
No comments:
Post a Comment